|
(Image by Gary Varvel) |
I've been off-duty for several days, and spent most of my time off the internet.
Oh, I scanned the headlines each morning, and I could have taken a moment to post something about the
mass shooting that occurred on Umpqua Community College, OR, nine days ago.
I didn't comment on this earlier, because I noticed from the headlines, along with the laments and rants from leftist acquaintance's on
Facebook, the narrative followed the same tiresome trajectory from previous mass shootings:
Blame guns
Blame law-abiding gun owners
Blame gun-rights advocacy groups (primarily the
NRA)
Lather, Rinse and Repeat.
Here's how leftists imagine "Gun Free Zones" work:
|
(Image by Chip Bok) |
Here's how they really work:
|
(Image by Nate Beeler) |
An instructor at a terrorism seminar I attended equated "Gun Free Zones" to watering holes in the animal kingdom. That is, any place animals gather to drink water, predators also gather to stalk their prey.
"Gun Free Zones" fail to take into account the predatory nature of the criminal (and/or insane) mind. Such individuals feel certain they'll be confronted by un-armed herd.
Looking back at the shooting itself: The
gunman was quickly identified (and thankfully killed by police), and the following day
the names of the victims were released. One man,
ex-Army vet, Chirs Mintz, rushed the gunman and was shot five times.
Of course, all this got lost in the leftist narrative, starting with
Obama's statements.
Conservatives haven't been idle and have came out swinging.
The Diplomad called this incident
More Days of Progressive Insanity.
Ann Coulter reminds us the
problem isn't guns or white men, while Mark Steyn points out
mentioned the shooting of a police accountant by a 15 year old jihadist in "gun free" Australia.
Erik Erickson shows us what
common sense gun control looks like.
Finally, S.E. Cupp suggests
Democrats actually work with the NRA to pass sensible laws.
Otherwise, any supposed gun control laws will be as effective as this:
|
(Image by Michael Ramirez) |